Case No. 347: Jess v. Dev
“Does the trash need taking out if it isn't overflowing yet?”
GUILTYDev is guilty of strategic trash compaction.
Sentence: Take the trash out tonight while narrating it like a nature documentary.
You tell your side. They tell theirs. Judge Whiskerton rules, and you get a video of the verdict to post.
Petty arguments only. Tap the judge.
1
Name the squabble and tell the judge what happened. Your side stays sealed until the ruling.
2
Send a link by text. They tell their side on their own phone, or on yours if they're sitting right there.
3
Judge Whiskerton picks a winner, names the crime, hands down a sentence, and makes a video you can post.
The judge reads the case, weighs both sides, and slams the gavel. The video is made right on your phone, ready for TikTok, Reels, or the group chat.
Case 512, Priya v. Marcus, is an example. Yours will star you.
Example rulings.
Case No. 347: Jess v. Dev
“Does the trash need taking out if it isn't overflowing yet?”
GUILTYDev is guilty of strategic trash compaction.
Sentence: Take the trash out tonight while narrating it like a nature documentary.
Case No. 288: Ana v. Theo
“Is a hot dog a sandwich?”
DISMISSEDCase dismissed. A hot dog is a hot dog.
Sentence: Split a hot dog and never speak of this again.
Case No. 401: Sam v. Lee
“Who ate the last slice of pizza?”
BOTH GUILTYSam and Lee are both guilty of pizza diplomacy failure.
Sentence: Split the next pizza evenly, with a witness counting slices out loud.
The judge rules on petty stuff: chores, snacks, spoilers, the thermostat. He won't rule on anything about safety, real money, or the law.
File a case